Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado
https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/derecho-comparado
<div align="justify"> <div align="justify">El <em>Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado</em> surgió en 1948, bajo la denominación de <em>Boletín del Instituto de Derecho Comparado</em>, como revista periódica del Instituto. La idea original del <em>Boletín</em>, consistió en dar a conocer en México y en el extranjero los resultados de la investigación realizada en el Instituto, así como para poner al alcance de los estudiosos del derecho, abogados, y público en general, información jurídica relevante. Desde su creación, ha aparecido de manera ininterrumpida cada cuatro meses.</div> </div>Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicases-ESBoletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado0041-8633<p align="justify">Once an article is accepted for publication, the author will assign the rights of his/her text to the Mexican Newsletter of Comparative Law, with the legal implications that this conveys. For the reproduction of any article or any part thereof, by any means, the written authorization of the Editor of the magazine will be required, the Editor will request to mention it is first publication by the Newsletter with the corresponding data.</p>The right of parents to educate their children according to their own convictions. Spain and the European Court of Human Rights. The case of comprehensive sexuality education
https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/derecho-comparado/article/view/19662
<p class="p1">The objective of comprehensive sexuality education is the acquisition of complete, accurate, and objective information about sexuality, based on scientific evidence, and appropriate for the age and maturity. It also includes training in democratic principles, values, and fundamental rights, essential for peaceful and responsible coexistence in society. Parents’ preferential right to the moral and religious education of their children must be exercised taking into consideration the best interests of children and adolescents. State intervention in education is key, given the benefits dimension of the right to education, and substantively, it is justified by the connection between education and democracy. The State has an obligation, in terms of its role in education, to teach content in a critical, objective, and pluralistic manner. It is prohibited from pursuing any indoctrination objectives.</p>Jhenny Rivas AlbertiAlexander Espinoza Rausseo
Copyright (c) 2025 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
2025-05-122025-05-12e19662e1966210.22201/iij.24484873e.2025.173.19662