Fundamentos constitucionales de la inmigración y evaluaciones basadas en la justicia
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
El objetivo de este trabajo es ofrecer una amplia caracterización del tipo de relato que, en mi opinión, no puede afrontar de forma plausible y concluyente el problema de la ética de las restricciones a la inmigración en un mundo no ideal a nivel de lo esencial constitucional. Argumento que las explicaciones de los controles de inmigración basadas en la justicia no evalúan normativamente lo que los controles de inmigración hacen a los extranjeros sometidos a ellos en condiciones no ideales, por lo que los juicios de justicia por sí mismos tienden a ser globalmente malos para los intereses de los inmigrantes. Explico esto insistiendo en que una cuestión previa sobre la legitimidad de los controles de inmigración ha sido pasada por alto por los relatos conocidos. Un análisis completo de la ética de la inmigración adecuado para orientar los fundamentos constitucionales debería ser capaz de conectar distintos tipos de evaluaciones basadas en la justicia para preguntar tanto qué exige la legitimidad del control institucional territorial como qué exige la justicia de la política de inmigración.
Detalles del artículo
Uso de licencias Creative Commons (CC)
Todos los textos publicados por Problema. Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho sin excepción, se distribuyen amparados bajo la licencia CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional; que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado, siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en este Anuario.
Accesibilidad a los artículos y demás publicaciones de manera total o parcial bajo el concepto de copia, distribución, comunicación pública, acceso interactivo (por internet u otros medios), manteniendo de manera explícita el reconocimiento al autor o autores y a la propia revista (reconocimiento de autoría).
Advertencia de que si se remezcla, modifican los artículos o se emplean fragmentos en otras creaciones, no se puede distribuir el material modificado, ni tampoco se permite reconstruir versiones a partir de los artículos originales publicados (obras derivadas).
Se prohíbe el uso de contenidos de los artículos publicados, total o parcialmente, con fines lucrativos (reconocimiento no comercial).
Consúltese https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Citas
Abizadeh, A. (2008). Democratic Theory and Border Coercion No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders. Political theory, 36(1), 37-65. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20452610
Abizadeh, A. (2012). On the demos and its kin: Nationalism, democracy, and the boundary problem. American Political Science Review, 106(04), 867-882. doi:10.1017/S0003055412000421
Barry, B. y Goodin, R. E. (Eds.). (2015). Free movement. Routledge.
Barry, Brian. (1995). Justice as Impartiality. Oxford University Press.
Blake, M. (2001). Distributive justice, state coercion, and autonomy. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 30(3), 257-296. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3557924
Blake, M. (2012). Immigration, Association, and Antidiscrimination. Ethics,122(4), 748-762. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/666327
Blake, M. (2013). Immigration, jurisdiction, and exclusion. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 41(2), 103-130. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42703847
Blake, M. (2014). The right to exclude. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 17(5), 521-537. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2014.919056
Buchanan, A. (2002). Political Legitimacy and Democracy. Ethics, 112(4), 689-719. https://doi.org/10.1086/340313
Camacho Beltrán, E. (2023). ¿Tenemos deberes de respetar los controles fronterizos de los estados?. En López-Farjeat & Coronado, Migración, territorio y fronteras: perspectivas del fenómeno migratorio. Alios Ventos
Camacho Beltrán, E. (2020). How and when are we right to Prioritize the interests of residents and Citizens?. World Affairs, 183(1), 8-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0043820020906798
Camacho Beltrán, E. (2022). Just Public Charge. En Verea, M. y Tigau, C. (Eds.), Trump’s legacy in immigration policy postpandemic challenges for Biden. UNAM/CISAN.
Camacho Beltran, E. (2015). Conservative libertarianism and ethics of borders. Topicos (México), 48, 227-261. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v0i48.678
Camacho Beltran, E. (2017). Nationalism and crisis. Tópicos (México), (52), 427-454. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v0i52.836
Camacho Beltran, E. (2016). The moral character of immigration controls. In Migración= Migration= Migração: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela 18-20 Set. 2015, Instituto Internacional Casa de Mateus (pp. 19-40). Instituto Internacional Casa de Mateus.
Caney, S. (2001). International Distributive Justice. Political Studies, 49, 974-997. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00351
Caney, S. (2007). Justice, Borders and the Cosmopolitan Idea: A Reply to Critics. Journal of Global Ethics, 3(2), 269-276.
Carens, J. H. (1987). Aliens and citizens: the case for open borders. The review of politics, 49(02), 251-273.
Carens, J. (2013). The ethics of immigration. Oxford University Press.
Cole, P. (2001). Philosophies of Exclusion: Liberal Political Theory and Immigration. Edinburgh University Press.
Cohen, G. A. (2008). Rescuing Justice and Equality. Harvard University Press
Christiano, T. (2008). Immigration, political community, and cosmopolitanism. San Diego L. Rev., 45, 933.
Cudd, A. E. (2006). Analyzing oppression. Oxford University Press.
DiAngelo, R. (2016). What Does it Mean to Be White?. Peter Lang.
Dworkin, R. (1985). A matter of principle. Oxford University Press.
Dworkin, R. (2002). Sovereign virtue: the theory and practice of equality. Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, R. (2011). Justice for hedgehogs. Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, R. (2013). A new philosophy for international law. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 2-30.
Fine, S. (2010). Freedom of Association Is Not the Answer. Ethics, 120(2), 338-356. https://doi.org/10.1086/649626
Freiman, C., & Hidalgo, J. (2016). Liberalism or immigration restrictions, but not both. J. Ethics & Soc. Phil., 10, 1.
Gans, C. (1998). Nationalism and immigration. Ethical Theory & Moral Practice,1(2), 159-180.
Gaus, G. (1996). Justificatory Liberalism: An Essay on Epistemology and Political Theory. Oxford University Press
Ernest, G. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Cornell University Press.
Haslanger, S. (2016). What is a (social) structural explanation?. Philosophical Studies, 173(1), 113-130.
Hidalgo, J. S. (2014). Freedom, immigration, and adequate options. Critical review of international social and political philosophy, 17(2), 212-234.
Ignatieff, M. (1994). Blood and Belonging. Vintage
Kukathas, C. (2010). The Case of Open Immigration. En Cohen, A. y Wellman C. (Eds.). Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics. Blackwell.
Lægaard, S. (2006). Feasibility and stability in normative political philosophy: the case of liberal nationalism. Ethical theory and moral practice, 9(4), 399-416.
Lægaard, S. (2007). David Miller on immigration policy and nationality. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24(3), 283-298. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24355044
Lister, M. (2010). Immigration, association, and the family. Law and Philosophy, 29(6), 717-745.
López-Guerra, C. (2020). Immigration, Membership, and Justice. En Allen, D. y Somanathan, R. (Eds.). Difference without Domination: Pursuing Justice in Diverse Democracies. University of Chicago Press.
Macedo, S. (2007). The moral dilemma of US immigration policy: Open borders versus social justice?. In Debating immigration (pp. 63-82). Cambridge University Press.
Mendoza, J. (2014). Discrimination and the Presumptive Rights of Immigrants, Critical Philosophy of Race, 2 (1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.5325/critphilrace.2.1.0068
Miklosi, Z. y Moles, A. (2014). Disagreement and legitimacy. Res Publica, 20(1), 1-8.
Miller, D. (1995). On nationality. Oxford University Press.
Miller, D. (2008). Immigrants, Nations, and Citizenship*. Journal of political philosophy, 16(4), 371-390.
Miller, D. (2010). Why immigration controls are not coercive: a reply to Arash Abizadeh. Political theory, 38(1), 111-120.
Miller, D. (2014). Immigration: The Case for Limitsn Contemporary. En A. Cohen and C. Wellman (Eds.), Debates in Applied Ethics (pp. 363–375). John Wiley & Sons.
Miller, D. (2015). Justice in immigration. European Journal of Political Theory, 1-19.
Peter, F. (2009). Democratic legitimacy. Routledge.
Quong, J. (2010). Liberalism without Perfection. Oxford University Press.
Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John. (1993). Political liberalism. Columbia University Press.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (2002). The law of peoples: with, the idea of public reason revisited. Harvard University Press.
Raz, J. (1985). Authority, Law and Morality. The Monist, 68(3), 295-324. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist198568335
Raz, J. (1986). The morality of freedom. Clarendon Press.
Stainer, H. (1992). Libertarianism and the transnational migration of people. En Barry y Goodin (Ed.), Free Movement (pp.87-94). Pennsylvania State University Press.
Sleat, M. (2015). Justice and Legitimacy in Contemporary Liberal Thought. Social theory and practice, 41(2), 230-252. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24332279
Simmons, A. J. (1996). Associative political obligations. Ethics, 247-273.
Simmons, A. J. (1999). Justification and Legitimacy. Ethics, 109(4), 739-771.
Simmons, A. J. (2001). On the territorial rights of states. Nous, 35(s1), 300-326.
Stilz, A. (2009). Why do states have territorial rights?. International theory,1(02), 185-213.
Valentini, L. (2012a). Ideal vs. Non-ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map. Philosophy Compass, 7(9), 654-664.
Valentini, L. (2012b). Assessing the global order: justice, legitimacy, or political justice?. Critical review of international social and political philosophy, 15(5), 593-612.
Van der Vossen, B. (2014). Immigration and self-determination. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X1453316
Walzer, M. (2008). Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. Basic books.
Wellman, C. H. (1995). On conflicts between rights. Law and philosophy, 14(3), 271-295.
Wellman, C. H. (1996). Liberalism, Samaritanism, and political legitimacy. Philosophy & public affairs, 25(3), 211-237.
Wellman, C.H. & Cole, P. (2011). Debating the Ethics of Immigration: Is there a Right to Exclude?. Oxford University Press
Williams, A. (2000). The Alleged Incompleteness of Public Reason, Res Publica, 6(2), 199–211.
Williams, A. (2012). The priority view bites the dust?. Utilitas, 24(3), 315-331.
Williams, B. (2005). In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, Princeton University Press.
Young, I. M. (1990). La justicia y la política de la diferencia. Cátedra.
Ypi, L. (2013). A Permissive Theory of Territorial Rights. European Journal of Philosophy, 21(1).
