Compensation Schemes for Health Harm Caused by Medical Error: Comparative Legal Research and Choice of Path for the Russian Federation
The purpose of this work is a comparative legal study of foreign experience in legal regulation and practice of applying special schemes for compensation for harm caused to health as a result of a medical error, as well as determining the prospects for the development of Russian legislation in this part. The article examines the regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation and a number of foreign countries (Belgium, Germany, Denmark, Norway, France, Sweden, the United Arab Emirates, etcétera.), the practice of their application. Methods used: general philosophical, general scientific, particular scientific, special (formal legal, comparative legal). Of particular value to the study is the fact that the author substantiates the possibility of applying special legal presumptions as an alternative to the use of costly and organizationally problematic no-fault schemes. For the first time, the prospects for the introduction of certain elements of compensation schemes without fault for «accidents» are determined in those areas of medical activity where it is especially difficult to establish the origin of harm from the actions (inaction) of a particular medical worker, including for individual elements of the scheme.
Descargas
- Citations
- Policy Citation - Policy Citations: 1
- Captures
- Mendeley - Readers: 2
- Mendeley - Readers: 1
Detalles del artículo
Uso de licencias Creative Commons (CC)
Todos los textos publicados por el Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado sin excepción, se distribuyen amparados con la licencia CC BY-NC 4.0 Internacional, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado, siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y la primera publicación en esta revista. No se permite utilizar el material con fines comerciales.
Derechos de autoras o autores
De acuerdo con la legislación vigente de derechos de autor el Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado reconoce y respeta el derecho moral de las autoras o autores, así como la titularidad del derecho patrimonial, el cual será transferido —de forma no exclusiva— al Boletín para permitir su difusión legal en acceso abierto.
Autoras o autores pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en el Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado (por ejemplo, incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o darlo a conocer en otros medios en papel o electrónicos), siempre que se indique clara y explícitamente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en este Boletín.
Para todo lo anterior, deben remitir la carta de transmisión de derechos patrimoniales de la primera publicación, debidamente requisitada y firmada por las autoras o autores. Este formato debe ser remitido en PDF a través de la plataforma OJS.
Derechos de lectoras o lectores
Con base en los principios de acceso abierto las lectoras o lectores de la revista tienen derecho a la libre lectura, impresión y distribución de los contenidos del Boletín por cualquier medio, de manera inmediata a la publicación en línea de los contenidos. El único requisito para esto es que siempre se indique clara y explícitamente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en el Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado y se cite de manera correcta la fuente incluyendo el DOI correspondiente.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Citas
Amicone, S., et al., Casebook of Traumatic Injury Prevention (Richard Volpe ed., Springer 2020), disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27419-1.
Bagmet, А. M. & Cherkasova, L. I., (2015). Professional mistakes and defects in rendering medical assistance to children: criminal-law evaluation. Russian Investigator, núm. 1.
Bal, B., (2009), An Introduction to Medical Malpractice in the United States, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 467, núm. 2, disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0636-2.
Bimbinov, A. A., (2019), Case study of bringing of medical staff to liability: certain conclusions, Criminal law, vol. 6.
Bookman, K., Zane, R. D., (2020), Surviving a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America, vol. 38, disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2020.01.006.
Brennan, T. А., et al. (1991). Incidence of Adverse Events and Negligence in Hospitalized Patients – Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. The New England journal of medicine, vol. 324, disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199102073240604.
Bykov, A. V., Zemlyanskiy, D. Y., (2020), On some peculiarities of establishment of the causal relationship in crimes of non-delivery or undue healthcare delivery. Russian Investigator, núm. 2, disponible en: https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3783-2020-2-33-37.
Chandra, M.S. & Math, S. B., (2016), Progress in Medicine: Compensation and medical negligence in India: Does the system need a quick fix or an overhaul? Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, núm. 19, disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-2327.192887.
Collet, L., (2020), Abnormal consequences of non-faulty medical accidents: Jurisprudence of the Conseil d’État. Bulletin of the National Academy of Medicine, núm. 204, disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.banm.2020.04.014.
Davydovsky, H. V., (1941), Medical errors, Soviet Medicine, núm. 3.
Fischer, K., (2020), Limitation of claims for compensation for damage due to medical errors. Health law, núm. 19, disponible en: https://doi.org/10.9785/gesr-2020-190817.
Fitzgerald, L., et al. Successful Public Policy: Lessons from Australia and New Zealand (Joannah Luetjens et al. eds., ANU Press 2019), disponible en: https://doi.org/10.22459/SPP.2019
Frezza, E. E., (2020), The Moral Distress Syndrome Affecting Physicians(Productivity Press 2020), disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003034766.
Glanzmann, P., (2021), Arbitration boards and advisory committees for medical liability questions. The orthopedist, núm. 50, disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-020-04044-x.
Kislaya, M. I. & Kisly, A. O., (2020), Responsibility for non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of obligations under the contract for the provision of paid medical services, disponible en: https://moluch.ru/conf/med/archive/360/15637/.
Kuli-Zade, T. A., (2019), Issues of the criminal law qualification of medical errors, Russian Investigator, núm. 8.
Liu, J., & Hyman, D. A., (2020), The Impact of Medical Malpractice Reforms. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, núm. 16, disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-060120-093911.
Mokhov, A. A., (2020), Insurance of civil (professional) liability in the biomedicine establishment period. Medical law, núm. 1.
Nguyen, T. B., (2019), Comparative analysis of medical malpractice law. Asian Journal of Law and Economics, núm. 10, disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1515/ajle-2019-0006.
Ogg, J., et al. Extended Working Life Policies (Ní Léime et al. eds., Springer International Publishing 2020), disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40985-2.
Ogus, A., et al., Shifts in Compensation Between Private and Public Systems (Willem H. van Boom & Michael G. Faure eds., Springer 2007), disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-71554-3.
Parizot, I. et al., (2017), Inequity of compensation trajectories for victims of medical injuries. A survey in the French out-of-court settlement mechanism. Journal of epidemiology and public health, núm. 65, disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respe.2016.12.027.
Pospelova, S. I., (2020), Undue medical assistance rendering: relevant qualifications issues. Medical law, núm. 6.
Raposo, V., (2015), How Can Asian Countries Deal with Medical Liability and Patient Compensation. International Journal of Social Sciences, núm. 4, disponible en: https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2015.s11.942956.
Roy, A. & Ross, N., (2020), Personal Injury Limitation Law, (Bloomsbury Professional 4th ed. 2020), disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781526508638.
Riedel, J., (2019), Framework rules for procedures implemented by expert and arbitration commissions of medical associations. Medical law, núm. 37, disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00350-019-5184-0.
Stauch, M. S., (2011), Medical Malpractice and Compensation in Germany. Chicago-Kent Law Review, núm. 86.
Svechnikova, I. V., (2020), Debatable issues of civil liability for improper provision of medical services, Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice, núm. 9.
Wallis, K. A., (2017), No-fault, no difference: no-fault compensation for medical injury and healthcare ethics and practice. British Journal of General Practice, núm.67, disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X688777.
Watson, К. & Kottenhagen, R., (2018), Patients’Rights, Medical Error and Harmonisation of Compensation Mechanisms in Europe. European Journal of Health Law, núm. 25, disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-12460348.
Zgonnikov, A. P. & Pushkareva, A. N., (2015), The professional liability insurance of medical professional and the problem of patient confidentiality in the Russian Federation: theoretical aspect. Legislation and economics, núm. 9.
Descargas
- Citations
- Policy Citation - Policy Citations: 1
- Captures
- Mendeley - Readers: 2
- Mendeley - Readers: 1
